Autonomous AI Agent Market Insights 2026, Analysis and Forecast to 2031
- Single User License (1 Users) $ 3,500
- Team License (2~5 Users) $ 4,500
- Corporate License (>5 Users) $ 5,500
The global technology landscape is undergoing a profound paradigm shift, moving beyond the era of static chatbots and predictive text generators into the dynamic age of Autonomous AI Agents. Unlike traditional Large Language Models (LLMs) which function as passive responders awaiting human prompts, autonomous agents are designed to function as active entities capable of perceiving their environment, reasoning through complex problems, creating actionable plans, executing tasks using external tools, and iterating based on feedback. This transition from "Chat" to "Act" represents the next frontier in artificial intelligence, fundamentally altering how enterprises operate and how individuals interact with digital ecosystems. As of 2026, the market size for Autonomous AI Agents is estimated to range between 6.1 billion USD and 9.9 billion USD. This valuation reflects a meteoric rise, driven by the convergence of more powerful foundation models, reduced inference costs, and the desperate industrial need to automate complex, multi-step cognitive workflows. The market is projected to expand at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 38.5% to 45.0% over the forecast period, a range consistent with the aggressive adoption curves seen in transformative technologies such as cloud computing and early generative AI.
Market Overview and Industry Characteristics
The Autonomous AI Agent industry is characterized by a unique architectural sophistication that separates it from the broader AI software market. While the underlying engine is often a Foundation Model (such as GPT-4, Claude, or Llama), the "Agent" adds layers of cognitive architecture: Memory (both short-term context and long-term vector storage), Planning (breaking goals into sub-tasks), and Tool Use (API integration). Leading strategic consulting firms and industry analysis suggest that the primary value driver in this market is not the model itself, but the orchestration layer that allows the model to behave forcefully and reliably.
A defining characteristic of this market is the shift from "Human-in-the-Loop" to "Human-on-the-Loop" and eventually "Human-out-of-the-Loop" for specific low-risk processes. In the early stages of generative AI, human supervision was constant. Autonomous agents, however, are engineered to handle ambiguity. When an agent encounters an error, it is designed to self-correct, debug its own output, or try an alternative strategy, rather than immediately halting and asking for human intervention. This capability is known as "agentic recursion."
The industry is currently in a phase of rapid experimentation and consolidation. Open-source projects have played a disproportionately large role in the early development of this sector, serving as the proving grounds for agentic architectures. However, as the market matures into 2026, there is a clear trend towards enterprise-grade platforms that offer observability, security, and governance—features that were lacking in the initial wave of experimental agents. The market is also bifurcating into "General Purpose Agents" (digital assistants capable of wide-ranging tasks) and "Vertical Agents" (highly specialized agents trained for specific domains like software engineering, legal discovery, or supply chain logistics).
Recent Industry Developments and Market News
The period spanning from early 2025 to early 2026 has been defined by high-profile acquisitions and strategic product launches that validate the agentic future. These developments highlight the race among tech giants to secure the infrastructure and talent required to dominate the agent economy.
On February 19, 2025, the software development sector witnessed a pivotal acquisition when Code quality testing startup SonarSource SA announced it had acquired AutoCodeRover. AutoCodeRover had garnered attention as the creator of an autonomous artificial intelligence platform specifically designed for software developers. The significance of this deal lies in its application of agentic AI to the "Shift Left" DevOps movement. AutoCodeRover built a large language model-based AI agent capable of autonomously identifying and fixing problematic code. Unlike standard code completion tools that suggest snippets as a developer types, this agent could independently navigate a repository, reproduce a bug, and submit a remediation patch. SonarSource stated that the deal would enable its customers to automate mundane tasks such as debugging and issue remediation, effectively freeing developers to focus on feature innovation rather than maintenance. The agents performance on the SWE-bench benchmark, a rigorous test of computer systems ability to resolve real-world GitHub issues, underscored the maturity of autonomous coding agents.
Almost a year later, on January 5, 2026, Microsoft signaled its intent to deepen the integration of agents into enterprise data infrastructure. The tech giant announced the acquisition of Osmos, an agentic AI data engineering platform. This move was strategically aimed at the Microsoft Fabric ecosystem. The core problem addressed by this acquisition is the "data readiness" bottleneck. Organizations possess vast amounts of data, but preparing it for analytics is a manual, slow, and expensive process. Osmos utilizes agentic AI to autonomously map, clean, and ingest raw data into OneLake, the unified data lake at the heart of Microsoft Fabric. By employing agents to handle the complex logic of data transformation (ETL), Microsoft is essentially replacing the manual labor of data engineers with autonomous systems that can reason through schema mismatches and data quality issues, drastically reducing the time-to-insight for enterprise customers.
Shortly thereafter, on January 16, 2026, the market experienced a massive consolidation event. Meta acquired Manus, a Singapore-based AI startup with Chinese roots, for over 2 billion USD. This landmark move underscores the high valuation premium placed on functional agent technology. Manus had distinguished itself by developing agents that could operate effectively in open-ended digital environments. The acquisition aligns with Metas broader strategy to integrate advanced AI across its product ecosystem, including WhatsApp, Messenger, and the Horizon metaverse platform. The diverse background of Manus, bridging Singaporean innovation with Chinese technical talent, highlights the global nature of AI development. This acquisition is poised to accelerate the development of general-purpose agents—digital companions that can navigate the web, manage schedules, and transact on behalf of users—redefining the consumer interface from scrolling feeds to interacting with intelligent entities.
Value Chain and Supply Chain Analysis
The value chain of the Autonomous AI Agent market is a multi-layered stack that relies on heavy computational resources upstream and complex integration logic downstream.
The Upstream segment is dominated by the Compute and Foundation Model providers. This includes the manufacturers of high-performance GPUs (like NVIDIA) and the creators of the foundational Large Language Models (such as OpenAI, Google DeepMind, Anthropic, and Meta). Without these powerful models, agents lack the reasoning capabilities required to plan and execute tasks. The raw "intelligence" is the commodity input for the agent market.
The Midstream segment constitutes the core "Agent Architecture" layer. This is where the distinct value of the agent market is created. It includes:
Orchestration Frameworks: Libraries and platforms (like LangChain or Microsoft Semantic Kernel) that allow developers to chain together prompts and manage the flow of information.
Memory Systems: Vector databases (such as Pinecone, Weaviate, or Milvus) act as the long-term memory for agents, allowing them to recall past interactions and specific documents, preventing them from being amnesiacs with each new session.
Tooling and API Connectors: This layer provides the "hands" for the agents. It involves the standardization of API definitions (often using OpenAPI schemas) so that agents can read documentation and understand how to interact with external software (e.g., sending an email, querying a SQL database, or updating a CRM).
The Downstream segment involves the Interface and Application layer. This includes the actual platforms where users interact with agents. It ranges from Integrated Development Environments (IDEs) for coding agents to browser extensions for web-browsing agents. The value here is defined by User Experience (UX) and trust—how well can the system visualize the agents thought process so the human user feels comfortable delegating power?
Application Analysis and Market Segmentation
The market is bifurcated into two primary segments: Enterprise and Individual, each with distinct drivers and use cases.
● Enterprise Applications: This is the largest revenue generator, accounting for the bulk of the market size. In the enterprise, autonomous agents are being deployed to handle high-volume, repetitive cognitive tasks.
Supply Chain and Logistics: Agents monitor inventory levels, autonomously negotiate re-stocking orders within pre-set price parameters, and re-route shipments based on weather data without human intervention.
Software Development: Agents like those from AutoCodeRover are used for autonomous QA testing, writing unit tests, and refactoring legacy codebases.
Customer Support: Beyond simple chatbots, agents now have the authority to process refunds, update billing information, and coordinate with logistics partners to resolve shipping disputes, effectively acting as Tier 1 and Tier 2 support reps.
Marketing and Sales: Agents autonomously conduct market research, scrape lead data, personalize outreach emails, and even schedule meetings, acting as a force multiplier for sales development representatives.
● Individual and Consumer Applications: This segment is driven by the desire for a "Digital Butler."
Personal Productivity: Agents help individuals manage complex calendars, book travel arrangements (including flights, hotels, and dinner reservations) by navigating multiple websites autonomously.
Research and Learning: Agents act as research assistants, synthesizing information from dozens of academic papers or news sources to provide comprehensive summaries and answering complex queries.
Personal Finance: Agents monitor bank accounts, cancel unwanted subscriptions, and autonomously move funds to high-yield accounts based on interest rate changes.
Regional Market Distribution and Geographic Trends
The adoption and development of Autonomous AI Agents vary significantly across global regions, influenced by regulatory frameworks, access to capital, and digital infrastructure.
● North America: The United States remains the dominant force in the Autonomous AI Agent market, estimated to hold the largest market share. The region benefits from a dense concentration of AI talent, deep venture capital pockets, and the presence of major hyperscalers (Microsoft, Google, Meta). The trend in North America is aggressive commercialization and vertical integration, with enterprises moving quickly from Proof of Concept (PoC) to production deployment.
● Asia Pacific: This region is witnessing the fastest growth rate, particularly in China, Singapore, and Japan. In China, despite US export controls on chips, there is a thriving ecosystem of application-layer innovation. The trend in China is towards integrating agents into "Super Apps" (like WeChat ecosystems), where agents facilitate commerce and daily life services. Japan is adopting agents rapidly in robotics and elderly care interfaces to address demographic shifts. Taiwan, China plays a critical, albeit indirect, role as the global foundry for the advanced semiconductors required to run the massive inference workloads of agentic AI. The availability of high-end chips from manufacturers in Taiwan, China is a bottleneck that dictates the speed of AI deployment globally.
● Europe: The European market is growing steadily but is heavily influenced by the EU AI Act. The focus here is on "Trustworthy AI." There is a strong trend towards developing agents with explainable reasoning processes. European enterprises are more cautious, prioritizing data privacy and strict governance over agents to ensure they do not violate GDPR or automated decision-making regulations. This has led to a niche market for "compliance-first" agents in the legal and financial sectors.
Key Market Players and Competitive Landscape
The competitive landscape is a dynamic mix of open-source initiatives that defined the category and well-funded startups and tech giants that are commercializing it.
● Auto-GPT: Originally an open-source experiment that went viral, Auto-GPT defined the category of "recursive" agents. It showed the world that an LLM could prompt itself to achieve a goal. While primarily a developer tool, it spawned a massive ecosystem of derivatives.
● Baby AGI: Created by Yohei Nakajima, this was another pioneering open-source project that introduced a simplified architecture for task management (Execution, Context, Prioritization). It emphasized the importance of task planning loops.
● AgentGPT: A web-based platform that democratized access to autonomous agents, allowing non-technical users to deploy agents directly in the browser. It focuses on accessibility and user interface.
● ChaosGPT: An experimental project that demonstrated the potential risks of autonomous agents (tasked with "destroying humanity" as a test case). It serves as a benchmark for safety research and the need for alignment.
● Jarvis (Microsoft): Not to be confused with the fictional character, Microsofts project (often associated with HuggingGPT) involves using an LLM as a controller to manage various other AI models to complete complex multi-modal tasks.
● Agent-LLM: A framework designed for creating agents with long-term memory and adaptive learning capabilities, focusing on the modularity of the agent architecture.
● SFighterAI: A specialized player focusing on agents for competitive gaming and simulation environments, demonstrating the speed and strategic planning capabilities of agents in real-time scenarios.
● Xircuits: A platform that allows for the visual orchestration of AI agents. It focuses on the "Midstream" value chain, providing tools to drag-and-drop agent workflows, making the logic transparent and editable.
● Micro-GPT: A lightweight agent implementation designed to be efficient and capable of running on more constrained coding tasks, optimizing for token usage and cost.
● AutoGPT.js: The JavaScript implementation of the autonomous agent concept, bringing agentic capabilities to the vast ecosystem of web developers and allowing for client-side execution of simple agent tasks.
Downstream Processing and Application Integration
For an autonomous agent to be useful, it must be integrated into the downstream systems of record. An agent that lives in a vacuum is a toy; an agent connected to the enterprise is a tool.
● API Integration and Authentication: The primary method of downstream processing is through APIs. Agents utilize standards like OAuth2 to authenticate against services like Salesforce, Jira, or SAP. The challenge here is "Permissioning." Enterprises are developing granular permission scopes so an agent can read a database but perhaps not delete rows, or draft an email but not send it without human approval.
● ERP and CRM Orchestration: Agents are being embedded directly into ERP systems. Instead of a human navigating a complex SAP GUI to check inventory, the agent queries the database directly via SQL or internal APIs, processes the data, and presents the finding. This integration transforms ERPs from passive databases into active systems that can alert management to anomalies.
● CI/CD Pipeline Integration: In software development, agents are integrated into the Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment pipelines. When a developer commits code, an agent downstream automatically analyzes the diff, writes test cases, and even attempts to build the project to check for compilation errors, acting as an autonomous gatekeeper.
Opportunities and Challenges
The Autonomous AI Agent market sits at the precipice of a productivity revolution, yet it faces formidable headwinds, both technical and geopolitical.
The opportunities are immense. The ability to decouple productivity from human labor hours offers the potential for non-linear economic growth. "Agent-as-a-Service" is emerging as a new business model, where companies rent digital workers for specific tasks—such as a "Research Agent" or a "Negotiation Agent"—on a consumption basis. This could drastically lower the operational costs for startups and SMEs, allowing them to compete with larger firms. Furthermore, the advancements in "Edge Agents"—agents small enough to run on local devices without internet connection—promise to bring intelligence to privacy-sensitive industries like healthcare and defense.
However, the challenges are equally significant. "Hallucination Loops" remain a critical technical hurdle; if an agent makes an error in step 1 of a 10-step plan, the error compounds, leading to a cascade of failure. Controlling costs is another issue, as autonomous loops can consume massive amounts of tokens (and thus money) if not properly bounded. Security is paramount, as "Prompt Injection" attacks could theoretically trick an agent into executing malicious commands, such as deleting data or transferring funds.
A newly intensifying challenge is the impact of protectionist trade policies, specifically the imposition of tariffs under the "America First" doctrine or similar policies from the Trump administration. These tariffs introduce a layer of volatility to the hardware supply chain. Autonomous agents are extremely compute-intensive, requiring massive clusters of GPUs for training and inference.
● Hardware Cost Inflation: Tariffs on imported electronics or semiconductor components from Asia could drastically increase the capital expenditure required to build and maintain the data centers that host these agents. This would drive up the cost of inference API calls, potentially slowing down the adoption of agent technology among cost-sensitive SMEs.
● Supply Chain Bifurcation: Aggressive trade policies may lead to a further decoupling of the US and Chinese technology ecosystems. This affects the flow of talent and the cross-pollination of open-source research. As seen in the Manus acquisition, the industry is global; barriers to cross-border M&A or data flows could hinder the ability of US companies to acquire the best agent technology if it originates abroad.
● Data Sovereignty and Trade Wars: If tariffs escalate into broader trade disputes, countries may retaliate with "Data Localization" laws, restricting the ability of US-based agents to process data from users in other jurisdictions. This would complicate the deployment of global enterprise agents that need to access data across international branches, forcing companies to maintain fragmented, region-specific agent fleets.
In conclusion, the Autonomous AI Agent market represents the maturation of generative AI into actionable intelligence. While the path forward is obstructed by technical limitations and geopolitical friction, the fundamental value proposition—software that can think, plan, and work alongside humans—ensures that this technology will be a cornerstone of the future digital economy.
1.1 Study Scope 1
1.2 Research Methodology 2
1.2.1 Data Sources 3
1.2.2 Assumptions 4
1.3 Abbreviations and Acronyms 5
Chapter 2 Global Autonomous AI Agent Market Executive Summary
2.1 Market Size and Growth Trends (2021-2031) 7
2.2 Market Dynamics 9
2.2.1 Growth Drivers: LLM Evolution and Task Automation 9
2.2.2 Market Constraints: Security and Hallucination Risks 11
2.2.3 Industry Opportunities: Agentic Workflows in Edge Computing 12
Chapter 3 Industry Value Chain and Technology Architecture
3.1 Autonomous AI Agent Industry Chain Analysis 14
3.2 Technical Architecture: Perception, Planning, and Memory Systems 16
3.3 Integration with Large Language Models (LLMs) and Tool-Use (APIs) 18
3.4 Patent Analysis and Software Copyright Trends 20
Chapter 4 Global Autonomous AI Agent Market by Type
4.1 Task-Oriented Autonomous Agents 22
4.2 Generative and Social Agents 24
4.3 Agent Orchestration Frameworks 26
Chapter 5 Global Autonomous AI Agent Market by Application
5.1 Enterprise (Customer Support, Coding, Marketing) 28
5.2 Individual (Personal Productivity, Education, Creative) 31
Chapter 6 Global Autonomous AI Agent Market by Region
6.1 North America 34
6.1.1 United States 36
6.1.2 Canada 38
6.2 Europe 40
6.2.1 United Kingdom 41
6.2.2 Germany 43
6.2.3 France 44
6.3 Asia Pacific 46
6.3.1 China 47
6.3.2 Japan 49
6.3.3 India 51
6.3.4 Southeast Asia 53
6.3.5 Taiwan (China) 55
6.4 South America (Brazil, Argentina) 57
6.5 Middle East & Africa (UAE, Saudi Arabia, South Africa) 59
Chapter 7 Competitive Landscape
7.1 Market Concentration and Global Ranking (2026) 61
7.2 Open-Source vs. Commercial Agent Development Trends 63
Chapter 8 Key Company Profiles
8.1 AgentGPT 65
8.1.1 Company Overview and Platform Development 65
8.1.2 SWOT Analysis 66
8.1.3 AgentGPT Autonomous AI Agent Revenue, Cost and Gross Profit Margin (2021-2026) 67
8.2 Baby AGI 69
8.2.1 Company Introduction 69
8.2.2 SWOT Analysis 70
8.2.3 Baby AGI Autonomous AI Agent Revenue, Cost and Gross Profit Margin (2021-2026) 71
8.3 Auto-GPT 72
8.3.1 Company Introduction 72
8.3.2 SWOT Analysis 73
8.3.3 Auto-GPT Autonomous AI Agent Revenue, Cost and Gross Profit Margin (2021-2026) 75
8.4 Agent-LLM 76
8.5 Jarvis 80
8.6 Xircuits 84
8.7 ChaosGPT 88
8.8 Micro-GPT 92
8.9 AutoGPT.js 96
8.10 SFighterAI 100
Chapter 9 Global Autonomous AI Agent Market Forecast (2027-2031)
9.1 Market Size Forecast by Region 104
9.2 Market Size Forecast by Application 106
9.3 Technology Adoption Curve Forecast 108
Table 2. Key Technology Patents in Autonomous AI Agent Planning Modules 21
Table 3. Global Autonomous AI Agent Market Revenue by Type (2021-2026) 23
Table 4. Global Autonomous AI Agent Market Revenue by Application (2021-2026) 29
Table 5. North America Autonomous AI Agent Revenue by Country (2021-2026) 35
Table 6. Europe Autonomous AI Agent Revenue by Country (2021-2026) 40
Table 7. Asia Pacific Autonomous AI Agent Revenue by Country (2021-2026) 46
Table 8. AgentGPT Autonomous AI Agent Revenue, Cost and Gross Profit Margin (2021-2026) 67
Table 9. Baby AGI Autonomous AI Agent Revenue, Cost and Gross Profit Margin (2021-2026) 71
Table 10. Auto-GPT Autonomous AI Agent Revenue, Cost and Gross Profit Margin (2021-2026) 75
Table 11. Agent-LLM Autonomous AI Agent Revenue, Cost and Gross Profit Margin (2021-2026) 79
Table 12. Jarvis Autonomous AI Agent Revenue, Cost and Gross Profit Margin (2021-2026) 83
Table 13. Xircuits Autonomous AI Agent Revenue, Cost and Gross Profit Margin (2021-2026) 87
Table 14. ChaosGPT Autonomous AI Agent Revenue, Cost and Gross Profit Margin (2021-2026) 91
Table 15. Micro-GPT Autonomous AI Agent Revenue, Cost and Gross Profit Margin (2021-2026) 95
Table 16. AutoGPT.js Autonomous AI Agent Revenue, Cost and Gross Profit Margin (2021-2026) 99
Table 17. SFighterAI Autonomous AI Agent Revenue, Cost and Gross Profit Margin (2021-2026) 103
Table 18. Global Forecast Market Size by Region (2027-2031) 105
Table 19. Global Forecast Market Size by Application (2027-2031) 107
Figure 1. Autonomous AI Agent Market Research Methodology 3
Figure 2. Global Autonomous AI Agent Market Size (2021-2031) 8
Figure 3. Autonomous AI Agent Value Chain Analysis 15
Figure 4. Market Share by Type in 2026 25
Figure 5. Market Share by Application in 2026 30
Figure 6. Asia Pacific Autonomous AI Agent Market Growth (2021-2026) 47
Figure 7. AgentGPT Autonomous AI Agent Market Share (2021-2026) 67
Figure 8. Baby AGI Autonomous AI Agent Market Share (2021-2026) 71
Figure 9. Auto-GPT Autonomous AI Agent Market Share (2021-2026) 75
Figure 10. Agent-LLM Autonomous AI Agent Market Share (2021-2026) 79
Figure 11. Jarvis Autonomous AI Agent Market Share (2021-2026) 83
Figure 12. Xircuits Autonomous AI Agent Market Share (2021-2026) 87
Figure 13. ChaosGPT Autonomous AI Agent Market Share (2021-2026) 91
Figure 14. Micro-GPT Autonomous AI Agent Market Share (2021-2026) 95
Figure 15. AutoGPT.js Autonomous AI Agent Market Share (2021-2026) 99
Figure 16. SFighterAI Autonomous AI Agent Market Share (2021-2026) 103
Figure 17. Global Autonomous AI Agent Revenue Forecast (2027-2031) 108
Research Methodology
- Market Estimated Methodology:
Bottom-up & top-down approach, supply & demand approach are the most important method which is used by HDIN Research to estimate the market size.

1)Top-down & Bottom-up Approach
Top-down approach uses a general market size figure and determines the percentage that the objective market represents.

Bottom-up approach size the objective market by collecting the sub-segment information.

2)Supply & Demand Approach
Supply approach is based on assessments of the size of each competitor supplying the objective market.
Demand approach combine end-user data within a market to estimate the objective market size. It is sometimes referred to as bottom-up approach.

- Forecasting Methodology
- Numerous factors impacting the market trend are considered for forecast model:
- New technology and application in the future;
- New project planned/under contraction;
- Global and regional underlying economic growth;
- Threatens of substitute products;
- Industry expert opinion;
- Policy and Society implication.
- Analysis Tools
1)PEST Analysis
PEST Analysis is a simple and widely used tool that helps our client analyze the Political, Economic, Socio-Cultural, and Technological changes in their business environment.

- Benefits of a PEST analysis:
- It helps you to spot business opportunities, and it gives you advanced warning of significant threats.
- It reveals the direction of change within your business environment. This helps you shape what you’re doing, so that you work with change, rather than against it.
- It helps you avoid starting projects that are likely to fail, for reasons beyond your control.
- It can help you break free of unconscious assumptions when you enter a new country, region, or market; because it helps you develop an objective view of this new environment.
2)Porter’s Five Force Model Analysis
The Porter’s Five Force Model is a tool that can be used to analyze the opportunities and overall competitive advantage. The five forces that can assist in determining the competitive intensity and potential attractiveness within a specific area.
- Threat of New Entrants: Profitable industries that yield high returns will attract new firms.
- Threat of Substitutes: A substitute product uses a different technology to try to solve the same economic need.
- Bargaining Power of Customers: the ability of customers to put the firm under pressure, which also affects the customer's sensitivity to price changes.
- Bargaining Power of Suppliers: Suppliers of raw materials, components, labor, and services (such as expertise) to the firm can be a source of power over the firm when there are few substitutes.
- Competitive Rivalry: For most industries the intensity of competitive rivalry is the major determinant of the competitiveness of the industry.

3)Value Chain Analysis
Value chain analysis is a tool to identify activities, within and around the firm and relating these activities to an assessment of competitive strength. Value chain can be analyzed by primary activities and supportive activities. Primary activities include: inbound logistics, operations, outbound logistics, marketing & sales, service. Support activities include: technology development, human resource management, management, finance, legal, planning.

4)SWOT Analysis
SWOT analysis is a tool used to evaluate a company's competitive position by identifying its strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats. The strengths and weakness is the inner factor; the opportunities and threats are the external factor. By analyzing the inner and external factors, the analysis can provide the detail information of the position of a player and the characteristics of the industry.

- Strengths describe what the player excels at and separates it from the competition
- Weaknesses stop the player from performing at its optimum level.
- Opportunities refer to favorable external factors that the player can use to give it a competitive advantage.
- Threats refer to factors that have the potential to harm the player.
- Data Sources
| Primary Sources | Secondary Sources |
|---|---|
| Face to face/Phone Interviews with market participants, such as: Manufactures; Distributors; End-users; Experts. Online Survey |
Government/International Organization Data: Annual Report/Presentation/Fact Book Internet Source Information Industry Association Data Free/Purchased Database Market Research Report Book/Journal/News |